Category Archives: Privacy

Happy Birthday to the Supreme Court! #SCOTUS #history cc: @oyez

This day in history, 1789, the Judiciary Act of 1789 establishes our first Supreme Court (warning: link opens to an auto-play video). John Jay would preside as our first chief justice.

First-Meeting-of-U.S.-Supreme-Court

Follow me on Twitter @PropertyAtty

Rob Bodine is a Virginia attorney focusing his practice on real estate and intellectual property law. He’s currently Virginia counsel with First Class Title, Inc., a Maryland title insurance and settlement company. Rob is also a licensed title insurance agent in Florida, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitutional Law, Copyright Law, Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause, Free Speech, History, Patent Law, Philosophy, Politics, Privacy, Voting Rights

No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy When Butt-Dialing #law #privacy

Image c/o someecards.com

 

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there’s no reasonable expectation to butt-dialing. Of course, they call it “pocket dialing” to avoid our snickering, but we all know what they mean. (Yeah, I know that “pocket dialing” is more accurate.)

James Huff, Chairman of the Kentucky International Airport Board (the “Board”), inadvertently dialed Carol Spaw, the Board liaison, during two conversations in which Huff allegedly conspired to discriminate unlawfully against Candace McGraw, the CEO of the Kentucky International Airport. The first conversation was with Vice Chairman of the Board, Larry Savage by telephone, so Spaw couldn’t hear what Savage was saying. Huff’s second conversation was with his wife, Bertha, who was in the room with him, so Spaw could hear what she was saying. Spaw disclosed the contents of the call to other members of the Board.

Huff and his wife, Bertha, sued for a violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act of 1968 (a.k.a., the Wiretap Act). The trial court ruled for Spaw as a matter of law, saying there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the conversation. In short, Huff should have been more careful. The Sixth Circuit held that Huff himself couldn’t sue, but sent the case back down to the trial court to determine whether Bertha Huff could sue. It was James’s neglect that resulted in the eavesdropping, but Bertha can’t be held liable for that.

So, even though the butt-dialer in question can’t sue, if the eavesdropper can hear what the other person involved in the conversation is saying, there could still be liability. Nevertheless, this is a helpful reminder of the consequences of butt … errrrr, pocket dialing.

The case can be found here.

Follow me on Twitter @PropertyAtty

Rob Bodine is a Virginia attorney focusing his practice on real estate and intellectual property law. He’s currently Virginia counsel with First Class Title, Inc., a Maryland title insurance and settlement company. Rob is also a licensed title insurance agent in Florida, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitutional Law, Privacy, Technology