Maybe They Should Crowdfund Their Appeal #patent #iplaw #kickstarter #internet

A federal trial-level court ruled in favor of Kickstarter yesterday. Kickstarter was requesting a declaration that its competitor’s patent (which arguably covered crowdfunding) was invalid. Judge Failla granted that relief on the grounds that ArtistShare’s patent (#7,885,887) claimed the patent-ineligible abstract concept of “patronage — a concept that is ‘beyond question of ancientlineage.'” The patent attempted to add elements that would transform that abstract concept into something patentable, but the Court noted that “these computer functions are well-understood, routine, conventional activities previously known to the industry … thus add[ing] nothing of practical significance to the underlying abstract idea.

When I was in law school (1996-2000), the rate at which trial court decisions was reversed by appellate courts hit 51%, meaning that it was better for the lower court to flip a coin than to analyze the law. Well, not really. The point, however, is that this could easily be overturned, though the courts do appear to be less enthusiastic about software patents. We’ll see if ArtistShare appeals.

Follow me on Twitter @PropertyAtty

Rob Bodine is a Virginia attorney focusing his practice on real estate and intellectual property law. He’s currently Virginia counsel with First Class Title, Inc., a Maryland title insurance and settlement company. Rob is also a licensed title insurance agent in Florida, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.


Leave a comment

Filed under Intellectual Property Law, Internet, Patent Law

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s